Designing an Intelligent Model for Detecting Financial Anomalies in Organizational Transactions Using Unsupervised Learning Algorithms

Authors

  • Mahdieh Sadat Karimi Pour Department of Financial Management, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran Corresponding author

Abstract

This study aimed to design an intelligent model for detecting financial anomalies in organizational transactions by emphasizing unsupervised learning algorithms, data requirements, expert validation, and financial governance mechanisms. This study employed a qualitative, applied-developmental design. The participants included 18 experts in finance, internal auditing, risk management, data analytics, and financial information technology from large organizations located in Tehran. Participants were selected through purposive and snowball sampling. Data were collected only through semi-structured interviews, and the interview process continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data through open, axial, and selective coding with the support of NVivo software. The credibility and dependability of the findings were strengthened through member checking, peer review, audit trail documentation, and constant comparison of codes and categories. The analysis of interviews resulted in five main categories: data architecture and transaction integration, algorithmic capabilities of unsupervised learning, interpretability and human validation, risk governance and internal control, and organizational implementation requirements. Participants emphasized that an intelligent anomaly detection model can be effective only when financial, operational, and behavioral data are integrated, cleaned, traceable, and analytically usable. They also stated that algorithms such as clustering, DBSCAN, Local Outlier Factor, Isolation Forest, and autoencoders can identify unusual transaction patterns without relying on labeled fraud data. However, algorithmic outputs should be interpreted, prioritized, and validated by financial experts, internal auditors, and risk management units. The proposed model indicates that intelligent detection of financial anomalies in organizational transactions is not merely a technical issue; rather, it requires alignment among data quality, algorithmic design, accounting knowledge, internal control, data governance, and organizational accountability. Unsupervised learning can enhance early detection of errors, misuse, control circumvention, and atypical transaction patterns, provided that it is implemented alongside human, ethical, and organizational oversight mechanisms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, M., Mahmood, A. N., & Islam, M. R. (2016). A survey of anomaly detection techniques in financial domain. Future Generation Computer Systems, 55, 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2015.01.001

Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Bolton, R. J., & Hand, D. J. (2002). Statistical fraud detection: A review. Statistical Science, 17(3), 235–255. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1042727940

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Breunig, M. M., Kriegel, H. P., Ng, R. T., & Sander, J. (2000). LOF: Identifying density-based local outliers. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (pp. 93–104). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/335191.335388

Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009). Anomaly detection: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 41(3), 1–58. https://doi.org/10.1145/1541880.1541882

Ester, M., Kriegel, H. P., Sander, J., & Xu, X. (1996). A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 226–231). AAAI Press.

Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Liu, F. T., Ting, K. M., & Zhou, Z. H. (2008). Isolation forest. In Proceedings of the 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (pp. 413–422). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2008.17

Ngai, E. W. T., Hu, Y., Wong, Y. H., Chen, Y., & Sun, X. (2011). The application of data mining techniques in financial fraud detection: A classification framework and an academic review of literature. Decision Support Systems, 50(3), 559–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.08.006

West, J., & Bhattacharya, M. (2016). Intelligent financial fraud detection: A comprehensive review. Computers & Security, 57, 47–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2015.09.005

Downloads

Publication Timeline

Published

How to Cite

Karimi Pour, M. S. . (1405). Designing an Intelligent Model for Detecting Financial Anomalies in Organizational Transactions Using Unsupervised Learning Algorithms. Smartification in Accounting, Economics, and Financial Management, 2(1), 1-13. https://jsaefm.com/index.php/jsaefm/article/view/39