Developing an Intelligent Model for Detecting Financial Fraud in Corporate Financial Statements Using Deep Neural Networks and Data Mining Techniques

Authors

  • Leila Sadat Hashemi Department of Islamic Economics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran Corresponding author

Keywords:

Financial fraud, Financial statements, Deep neural networks, Data mining, Intelligent auditing, Thematic analysis, Anomaly detection.

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to develop an intelligent model for detecting financial statement fraud in companies using deep neural networks and data mining techniques based on the perceptions and experiences of financial, auditing, and data analytics experts. This qualitative study was conducted using thematic analysis. The participants included independent auditors, chief financial officers, data mining specialists, capital market analysts, and internal control experts based in Tehran. Purposeful and snowball sampling strategies were used, and data were collected through semi-structured interviews. The interview process continued until theoretical saturation was achieved, and 21 participants were finally included. All interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using NVivo software. Data analysis followed the six-phase thematic analysis procedure, including familiarization with the data, generating initial codes, searching for themes, reviewing themes, defining and naming themes, and producing the final report. Trustworthiness was enhanced through member checking, peer debriefing, maintaining an audit trail, and continuous comparison of codes and categories. The analysis resulted in five main categories: data-driven architecture for fraud detection, financial and non-financial red flags, deep neural network and data mining design, interpretability and model governance, and organizational and auditing implementation requirements. The findings indicated that intelligent fraud detection cannot rely solely on traditional financial ratios. Instead, it requires the integration of structured financial data, textual disclosures, management discussion reports, audit evidence, behavioral indicators, and corporate governance variables. Participants emphasized that deep neural networks, especially when combined with feature selection, anomaly detection, and natural language processing, can reveal hidden patterns of financial manipulation. However, they also stressed that model outputs must be interpretable and usable for auditors, regulators, and financial decision-makers. The proposed model conceptualizes financial statement fraud detection as a multilayered, data-driven, interpretable, and human–AI collaborative process. It can support internal auditing, external auditing, capital market supervision, and corporate risk management by enabling preventive decision-making, improving financial transparency, and reducing information asymmetry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbasi, A., Albrecht, C., Vance, A., & Hansen, J. (2012). MetaFraud: A meta-learning framework for detecting financial fraud. MIS Quarterly, 36(4), 1293–1327.

Beneish, M. D. (1999). The detection of earnings manipulation. Financial Analysts Journal, 55(5), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v55.n5.2296

Bolton, R. J., & Hand, D. J. (2002). Statistical fraud detection: A review. Statistical Science, 17(3), 235–249. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1042727940

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.

Craja, P., Kim, A., & Lessmann, S. (2020). Deep learning for detecting financial statement fraud. Decision Support Systems, 139, 113421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2020.113421

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

Dechow, P. M., Ge, W., Larson, C. R., & Sloan, R. G. (2011). Predicting material accounting misstatements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(1), 17–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01041.x

Doshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2017). Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.08608

Fanning, K. M., & Cogger, K. O. (1998). Neural network detection of management fraud using published financial data. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 7(1), 21–41.

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.

Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep learning. MIT Press.

LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

Lin, J. W., Hwang, M. I., & Becker, J. D. (2003). A fuzzy neural network for assessing the risk of fraudulent financial reporting. Managerial Auditing Journal, 18(8), 657–665. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900310495151

Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 4765–4774.

Ngai, E. W. T., Hu, Y., Wong, Y. H., Chen, Y., & Sun, X. (2011). The application of data mining techniques in financial fraud detection: A classification framework and an academic review of literature. Decision Support Systems, 50(3), 559–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.08.006

Perols, J. (2011). Financial statement fraud detection: An analysis of statistical and machine learning algorithms. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(2), 19–50. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50009

Purda, L., & Skillicorn, D. (2015). Accounting variables, deception, and a bag of words: Assessing the tools of fraud detection. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(3), 1193–1223. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12089

Ravisankar, P., Ravi, V., Raghava Rao, G., & Bose, I. (2011). Detection of financial statement fraud and feature selection using data mining techniques. Decision Support Systems, 50(2), 491–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.11.006

Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8

Schreyer, M., Sattarov, T., Borth, D., Dengel, A., & Reimer, B. (2017). Detection of anomalies in large scale accounting data using deep autoencoder networks. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.05254

Sharma, A., & Panigrahi, P. K. (2013). A review of financial accounting fraud detection based on data mining techniques. International Journal of Computer Applications, 39(1), 37–47.

West, J., & Bhattacharya, M. (2016). Intelligent financial fraud detection: A comprehensive review. Computers & Security, 57, 47–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2015.09.005

Zhou, W., & Kapoor, G. (2011). Detecting evolutionary financial statement fraud. Decision Support Systems, 50(3), 570–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.08.007

Downloads

Publication Timeline

Published

How to Cite

Hashemi, L. S. . (1404). Developing an Intelligent Model for Detecting Financial Fraud in Corporate Financial Statements Using Deep Neural Networks and Data Mining Techniques. Smartification in Accounting, Economics, and Financial Management, 1(2), 1-15. https://jsaefm.com/index.php/jsaefm/article/view/8