Exploring the Effects of Generative Artificial Intelligence on the Preparation, Analysis, and Interpretation of Financial Reports in Large and Complex Organizations

Authors

  • Ali Akbar Ghasemi Tabar Department of Financial Management, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran Corresponding author

Keywords:

Generative artificial intelligence, financial reporting, financial analysis, large organizations, internal control, data governance, intelligent accounting

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the effects of generative artificial intelligence on the preparation, analysis, and interpretation of financial reports in large and complex organizations, with emphasis on opportunities, risks, and governance requirements. This qualitative exploratory study was conducted using semi-structured interviews. The participants were 24 financial managers, financial reporting managers, financial analysts, internal auditors, internal control specialists, and financial systems/data experts working in large organizations located in Tehran. Participants were selected through purposive sampling with maximum variation. Data collection continued until theoretical saturation was reached; saturation occurred at the twenty-first interview, and three additional interviews were conducted to confirm thematic stability. The interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed through thematic analysis using NVivo software. Five main categories emerged from the data: intelligent acceleration of financial report preparation, deepening of financial analysis and interpretation of complex data, reconstruction of financial narrative and management reporting, emergence of new risks related to reliability, confidentiality, and controllability, and transformation of professional roles and financial competencies. Participants emphasized that generative AI can reduce the time required for drafting reports, preparing explanatory notes, benchmarking, and developing managerial scenarios. However, they also noted that ungoverned use may increase interpretive errors, overreliance, weak auditability, and ambiguity in professional accountability. Generative AI should be viewed not as a substitute for professional financial judgment, but as an augmenting technology that can improve speed, analytical depth, and reporting coherence. Its effective use requires reliable data architecture, AI-specific internal controls, human oversight, specialized training, and transparent accountability mechanisms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Blankespoor, E., deHaan, E., & Li, Q. (2026). Generative AI in financial reporting. Journal of Accounting Research.

Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., Bernstein, M. S., Bohg, J., Bosselut, A., Brunskill, E., Brynjolfsson, E., Buch, S., Card, D., Castellon, R., Chatterji, N., Chen, A., Creel, K., Davis, J. Q., Demszky, D., ... Liang, P. (2021). On the opportunities and risks of foundation models. Stanford Center for Research on Foundation Models.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Agarwal, S., Herbert-Voss, A., Krueger, G., Henighan, T., Child, R., Ramesh, A., Ziegler, D. M., Wu, J., Winter, C., ... Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 1877–1901.

Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. (2026). Achieving effective internal control over generative AI. COSO.

Dong, M. M., Stratopoulos, T. C., & Wang, V. X. (2024). A scoping review of ChatGPT research in accounting and finance. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 55, 100715.

Eloundou, T., Manning, S., Mishkin, P., & Rock, D. (2024). GPTs are GPTs: Labor market impact potential of LLMs. Science, 384(6702), 1306–1308.

Financial Reporting Council. (2026). AI in audit: Generative and agentic AI guidance. FRC.

International Federation of Accountants. (2026). Artificial intelligence and accounting. IFAC.

Kim, A., Muhn, M., & Nikolaev, V. (2024). Financial statement analysis with large language models. Working paper.

KPMG. (2024). Transforming into a new era with the AI-empowered finance function. KPMG International.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

Mökander, J., Schuett, J., Kirk, H. R., & Floridi, L. (2023). Auditing large language models: A three-layered approach. AI and Ethics.

National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework: Generative Artificial Intelligence Profile. NIST.

Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. (2024). Staff update on outreach activities related to the integration of generative artificial intelligence in audits and financial reporting. PCAOB.

Stratopoulos, T. C., & Wang, V. X. (2025). Artificial intelligence and accounting research: A framework and agenda. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems.

Downloads

Publication Timeline

Published

How to Cite

Ghasemi Tabar, A. A. . (1404). Exploring the Effects of Generative Artificial Intelligence on the Preparation, Analysis, and Interpretation of Financial Reports in Large and Complex Organizations. Smartification in Accounting, Economics, and Financial Management, 1(4), 66-79. https://jsaefm.com/index.php/jsaefm/article/view/26